Version 9.1.151.3 (Support Release - 25 March 2025)
Performance Management
Final Review - Autocopy error (#129765)
Problem
- When auto-copy is enabled and the section is set to auto-distribute there is a scenario where the weights are not automatically distributed (the assumption is that they will be distributed during submission).
- On the auto copy auto approval it checks whether the weights are valid for all items in each section, finds these items that are not auto-distributed and still have a weight of 0% and does not auto approve the contract OS.
Solution
- When the auto-copy auto approval happens check if the section needs to be auto-distributed and always redistribute the weights before validating them for that section.
- This ensures that always on auto copy approval if the section is set to auto distribute it will redistribute the weights for all items according to the relevant L1 & L2s if applicable.
Evaluation Summary - Min and Max scores not reflecting correctly (#129365)
Problem
- The overall minimum and maximum ratings displayed on the Evaluation Summary was showing the LEAST AND MOST used ratings instead of the highest and lowest ratings used.
Solution
- Changed the overall min and max ratings to be the minimum and maximum ratings selected across all KPIs that were rated.
Copy the weights of the contracts instead of the Review Setup when using the Copy from Previous (#126081)
Problem
- As a Performance User, I want to copy the weights of the contracts instead of the Review Setup when using the Copy from Previous
Solution
- When the auto-copy setting is on, the section weights will copy from the contract, otherwise it will copy from the review
Agreement finalized with empty section when section weight change is not allowed (#129009)
Problem
- On the Review Setup, the Primary Goals Setup does not allow the section weight to be changed.
- After importing the following error was thrown, but the contract was created and finalized with the Primary goals section left blank.
Solution
- The Import will stop if an invalid agreement will be created
Able to import the same file on two different setups in the same year (#129006)
Problem
- The user could not import multiple periods at the same time, and the user could create a contract in more than one period item.
Solution
- Changed PM Import so you can import multiple periods at the same time, as well as excluding users from creating contracts in more than 1 item per review year
HR Processes
Signify Down (#129685)
Problem
- When submitting an Hr Process Request the process fails, on the logs, it is indicated unauthenticated.
- After investigations it was determined that it fails only when the Position Approval Level type is selected.
- When this is the type then the query to fetch the user details for the approval level fails due to a missing column on the dapper query.
- This failure bubbles up to the MVC that originally made the call and MVC then tries to load the error page which fails with unauthenticated when trying to read the RulesetId, masking the original problem.
Solution
- Corrected the dapper query to select the additional required column.
- Also added additional error logging on the hr process submit to better log on JobProfiler when there is an error that occurs.
Learning Management
Saving Attendance Register and Default Recipient Check on Email Notification (#129038)
Problem
- The client requested to save attendance when the notification
- The client requested that the parent checkbox be a default recipient when sending absent notifications
Solution
- Modified
CreateAttendanceNotificationModalto callsaveAttendanceRegisterbefore creating notifications. - Changed
includeParentstate inAttendanceNotificationModaltotrueby default
Tenant Management
Tenant Status stuck on 'Sending Completion Notification' (#129577)
Problem
- Ruleset and Tenant creation is failing to complete because of the recent audit changes, the calls are made anonymously and thus identity is not set, but on the audit service it tries to fetch the ruleset ID from identity, and if not found uses the RulesetId column from the changed entity.
- The problem however is that MaterialiedRuleset tables do not have the RulesetId column (It's called just Id).
Solution
- Added the INonAuditable interface to the RB and JP materialised ruleset entities. I also added a change on the SqlServerDbContext class to check that when the specific entity is the Ruleset in the Account Domain use the Id column (For audits directly on the Account. Ruleset table).
- I also added a fallback to 0 if the entity in question does not have a RulesetId. This way, the audit does not break and at least logs the audit against RulesetId 0.